<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When not to use a framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/</link>
	<description>Startups, Programming and stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arconan</title>
		<link>http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Arconan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diovo.com/?p=121#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Very good point, developers for some reason is not happy buying a part, they HAVE to buy the whole damn car.

Use only what you need, even when it comes to frameworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point, developers for some reason is not happy buying a part, they HAVE to buy the whole damn car.</p>
<p>Use only what you need, even when it comes to frameworks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trandafir</title>
		<link>http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Trandafir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diovo.com/?p=121#comment-739</guid>
		<description>Your 579 argument is flawed. It was more like 579 lines of Ruby /plus Rails/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your 579 argument is flawed. It was more like 579 lines of Ruby /plus Rails/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niyaz PK</title>
		<link>http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Niyaz PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diovo.com/?p=121#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Duncan,
Exactly what I was trying to say. As you pointed out, many enterprise solutions use these big frameworks simply for the sake of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,<br />
Exactly what I was trying to say. As you pointed out, many enterprise solutions use these big frameworks simply for the sake of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://diovo.com/2008/06/when-not-to-use-a-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diovo.com/?p=121#comment-737</guid>
		<description>Absolutely, I wonder that for even those enterprise apps that make extensive use of frameworks whether they get any real benefit out of them.

What&#039;s the point in making something re-usable if you&#039;re never going to re-use it?

And if you don&#039;t follow it through ALL THE WAY (unit testing, mocking, documentation etc) then chances are it&#039;s costing you more to develop, and you&#039;re never going to get the payback you should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, I wonder that for even those enterprise apps that make extensive use of frameworks whether they get any real benefit out of them.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the point in making something re-usable if you&#8217;re never going to re-use it?</p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t follow it through ALL THE WAY (unit testing, mocking, documentation etc) then chances are it&#8217;s costing you more to develop, and you&#8217;re never going to get the payback you should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

